RUS, XITOY VA OʻZBEK TILSHUNOSLIGIDA ISHONTIRISH VA SUGGESTIV TA’SIR NUTQ AKTLARINING TADQIQI TOʻGʻRISIDA
Keywords:
ishontirish nutqiy aktlari, undash nutqiy aktlari, nutqiy taʼsir, pragmalingvistika, perlokutiv effekt, kommunikativ strategiyalar, qiyosiy tahlil.Abstract
Maqola rus, xitoy va oʻzbek tilshunosligida ishontirish va undash suggestiya nutq aktlarining oʻrganilishiga doir qiyosiy tahlilga bagʻishlangan. Unda nutqiy aktlar umumiy nazariyasi, pragmatika, lingvokulturologiya va diskurs-tahlilning ratsional-argumentativ hamda suggestiv taʼsirni tavsiflashda har bir milliy maktabda qanday moslashtirilgani koʻrib chiqiladi.
Downloads
References
1. Abdelhamid S.A., Alefirenko N.F., Chumak-Zhun I.I. Speech acts and Russian text-generating discourse // Russian Language Studies. – 2023. – Vol. 21. – № 1. – P. 7-17.
2. Austin J.L. How to Do Things with Words. – 2nd ed. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975. – 168 p.
3. Axmadjonov N.Z., Komilova M.R. Revisiting speech act theory in German linguistics: a systematic review of methodological approaches // Cogent Arts & Humanities. – 2025. – Vol. 12. – № 1.
4. Bobojonova S.Yo‘. Ta’limiy diskurs va uning lingvistik tahlili // Academic Research in Educational Sciences. – 2023. – Vol. 4 (TMA Conference). – P. 135-137.
5. Gu Y. Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese // Journal of Pragmatics. – 1990. – Vol. 14. – № 2. – P. 237-257.
6. Hakimov M. O‘zbek tilida matnning pragmatik talqini. – Toshkent: Fan, 2001.
7. Khushmamatova A. The linguistic-cognitive aspects of dialogical communication // International Scientific Journal of Biruni. – 2025. – Vol. 4. – Issue 2. – P. 216-219.
8. Li K., Liu W. Delving into suggestion speech acts in Chinese authoritative academic discourse: A cognitive pragmatic perspective // Pragmatics. – 2024. – Vol. 34. – № 2. – P. 161-189.
9. Liu S. An experimental study of the classification and recognition of Chinese speech acts // Journal of Pragmatics. – 2011. – Vol. 43. – № 6. – P. 1801-1817.
10. Sabirova M.K. The Ways of Expressing Speech Acts in Newspaper Texts // O‘zbekistonda xorijiy tillar. – 2020. – № 3 (32). – P. 42-51.
11. Safarov Sh. Pragmalingvistika. – Toshkent: O‘zbekiston milliy ensiklopediyasi, 2008. – 318 b.
12. Searle J.R. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts // Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979. – P. 1-29.
13. Skewis M. Mitigated directness in Honglou meng: directive speech acts and politeness in eighteenth century Chinese // Journal of Pragmatics. – 2003. – Vol. 35. – № 2. – P. 161-189.
14. Wang Z., Liang Z., Liu P., Mao Y., Ma Y. I am criticizing you when I say “I am not criticizing you”: a prosodic-pragmatic exploration of the Chinese metapragmatic negation bùshì wǒ shuō nǐ // Language Sciences. – 2025. – Vol. 110.
15. Zou L., Zhu Y. Review of Research on Development of Speech Act Theory and Its Application // International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation. – 2022. – Vol. 5. – № 12. – P. 127-135.
16. Абдуазизова Д.А. Анализ паралингвистических средств в художественном тексте // O‘zbekistonda xorijiy tillar. – 2023. – № 5 (52). – С. 96-108.
17. Жарков И.В., Колтунова Е.А. Оппозиция речевых актов одобрения и оправдания в сфере судебной лингвистической экспертизы // Юрислингвистика. – 2020. – № 15. – С. 17-21.
18. Норман Б.Ю. Согласие и несогласие в свете теории речевых актов // Коммуникативные исследования. – 2020. – Т. 7. – № 2. – С. 300-315.
19. Стернин И.А. Введение в речевое воздействие. – Воронеж: Истоки, 2001. – 252 с.
20. Федорова Л.Л. Типология речевого воздействия и его место в структуре общения // Вопросы языкознания. – 1991. – № 6. – С. 46-50.
